Title: [sca-bpel] Issue 61: proposal
As I was discussing on the call, I'd like to suggest changing the
following sentence:
"SCA BPEL In an SCA WS-BPEL Runtime,
variables associated with SCA properties and
multi-valued reference references are set by
the runtime based on the configuration
of the containing composite. "
I have to check, but on last week's call, Mike was saying that Assembly
has a defined term (along the lines of "Domain Configuration"?), which
I think should be explicitly referenced instead of the phrase "based
on the configuration of the containing composite." I think that the
current wording is too loose, and confusing.
On 1/14/2010 12:15 AM, Anish Karmarkar wrote:
" type="cite">
At the end of section 3.1 Properties we add the
following text:
The WS-BPEL specification requires that the variable initialization
logic in scopes that contain (or whose children contain) a start
activity use only idempotent functions in the from-spec. In an SCA
WS-BPEL Runtime, variables associated with SCA properties and
multi-valued reference are set by the runtime based on the configuration
of the containing composite. Therefore, the idempotency is guaranteed
only for a given SCA domain-level composite. The SCA Assembly
specification allows for a variety of implementation including ones that
allow dynamicity for the SCA domain-level composite. See Sections
10.7.1, 10.7.2, 10.8 and 10.9. For such runtimes, the properties and
muti-valued references may change with a change in the domain-level
composite.
Comments?
-Anish
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
