← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Raw Text from SCA-J Conf call

From
Mike Edwards <>
Date
2009-06-19T15:12:29+00:00
ID
Thread
Raw Text from SCA-J Conf call
Folks,

Here is the raw text of the meeting
of 19th June:

- Roll Call

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/membership.php?wg_abbrev=sca-j

- Appointment of scribe. List attached
below

- Agenda bashing

- Approval of minutes for 15th June
2009

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/32939/SCA%20Java%20Minutes%202009-06-15.doc

0. Administration 

- Issue Status: Open: 28

- SCA-J Public Review

    Started: 8th June 2009

    Ends:    7th
August 2009

1. Review action items:

Action Items that I believe are done:

Action Items that I believe are still
to be done:

2008-11-11-22: Mark to draw up some
wording for Direction 1 (as discussed at the November F2F) for JAVA-62

2008-11-11-23: Mark (and others prepared
to help) to investigate the WorkManager JEE spec and determine its applicability
to SCA for JAVA-62

2009-05-11-01: Editors: remove extra
space on line 767 of CD01 (PDF)

2009-06-01-01: MikeE to raise issue
regarding some Assembly tests that require Java

2009-06-05-02: Anish to raise an issue
in Bindings TC against WS binding spec to address wireFormat and operationSelector
pseudo-schema once the Assembly change is made to make these abstract.

2. New Issues

None

3. Open Issues

a. JAVA-140: Schema for @ejb-link-name
is incorrect

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-140

Updated proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00021.html

b. JAVA-149: SCA Spring C & I specification
need to specify the limitations of implicit references

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-149

Proposal in Jira

c. JAVA-150: SCA Spring C & I specification
need to mention how SCA runtime should load multiple application context
files.

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-150

Proposal in Jira

d. JAVA-114: Spring CI runtime behaviour
when annotation rules are violated

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-114

Proposal in Jira

e. JAVA-24: The EJB bindings specification
should provide explicity statesupport or non-support for Callbacks

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-24

Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00049.html

f. JAVA-122: EJB Binding - Remove references
to conversational function

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-122

Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00050.html

g. JAVA-118: EJB Binding: Need description
for <wireFormat/> and <operationSelection/>

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-118

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00027.html

Waiting for Assembly and Binding issues
to be raised and resolved

Latest proposal 1: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00051.html

Latest proposal 2: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00056.html

h. JAVA-58: SCA Spring C&I Specification
does not have a normative definition of how to calculate the ComponentType
of a Spring Application context

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-58

Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00107.html

PDF: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/33005/sca-springci-draft-20070926_Issue58d.pdf

MS Word: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/33004/sca-springci-draft-20070926_Issue58d.doc

i JAVA-164: Spring C&I SCA extension
element does not provide full functionality possible in an SCA CT

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-164

Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00111.html

PDF: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/33007/sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD01%2BIssue164.pdf

MS Word: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/33006/sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD01%20Issue164.doc

4. Issues waiting for updated proposals

a. JAVA-59: SCA Spring C & I specification
does not state what happens when a Bean exposed as a service implements
mutliple interfaces

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-59

Waiting for updated proposal

b. JAVA-92: Spring C&I spec needs
to define how effective CT is calculated

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-92

Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200905/msg00102.html

Waiting for JAVA-58 to be resolved.

5. Issues with no proposals

a. JAVA-163: Spring C&I sca-spring:reference
element has a default attribute which is unexplained

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-163

No proposal

b. JAVA-107: RFC2119 Language is needed
for the EJB Binding Specification

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-107

No proposal

c. JAVA-106: RFC2119 Language is needed
for Spring C&I Specification

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-106

No proposal

d. JAVA-63: SCA Spring C & I specification
does not state whether Constructor Injection should be supported

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-63

No proposal

6. AOB

a. Straggler roll call

---------------------------------------------------------------

Rotating scribe list:

Ron Barack SAP AG (3)

Michael Beisiegel IBM (3)

Sanjay Patil SAP AG (3)

Jim Marino Individual (4)

Pradeep Simha TIBCO Software Inc. (5)

Vamsavardhana Chillakuru IBM (3)

Plamen Pavlov SAP AG (2)

Meeraj Kunnumpurath Individual (3)

Martin Chapman Oracle Corporation (9)

Yang Lei (7)

Mike Edwards IBM (10)

Graham Charters IBM (3)

Anish Karmarkar Oracle Corporation (12)

Ashok Malhotra Oracle Corporation (11)

Bryan Aupperle IBM (12)

Yang Lei (8 )

Simon Nash Individual (9)

anonymous morphed into anish

Scribe: Mike Edwards

Agenda Bashin

No changes

Item 1 Meeting Minutes

Minutes for 15th June

RESOLUTION: Minutes are approved without
objection

Item 2 TC Admin

28 open issues

Public review has started for Java CAA,
Java CI specs

Ends 7th August

Item 3 Action Items

No progress on any action items - all
remain pending

Item 4 New Issues

No new issues

Item 5 Open Issues

a. JAVA-140: Schema for @ejb-link-name
is incorrect

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-140

Updated proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00021.html

Anish: the only issue is whether it
should be string or anyURI

Bryan moves to resolve Issue 140 using
the proposal in the email http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00021.html

Mike Edwards seconds

Anish: Should this be anyURI rather
than string?

Mike E: This was debated on the email
list as Dave started with anyURI but changed it as a result of previous
discussions

Bryan: Could there be a circumstance
where the pointer to the JAR would not follow normal URI schemes?

Motion passes unanimously

RESOLUTION: Issue 140 is resolved

JAVA-149: SCA Spring C & I specification
need to specify the limitations of implicit references

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-149

Proposal in Jira

Mike E presents the proposal

Anish: The proposal is quite vague -
it isn't spec language

ACTION 20090619-01: Mike E to prepare
a detailed proposal for Issue 149

JAVA-150: SCA Spring C & I specification
need to mention how SCA runtime should load multiple application context
files.

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-150

Proposal in Jira

Need to get Ram on a call to present
this one

JAVA-114: Spring CI runtime behaviour
when annotation rules are violated

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-114

Proposal in Jira

Discussion of the fact that currently,
there is nothing in the spec that says that SCA annotations are supported

- and that a discussion on the componentType
calculation indicated that an issue needs raising to add support for SCA
annotations to the Spring spec

JAVA-24: The EJB bindings specification
should provide explicity statesupport or non-support for Callbacks

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-24

Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00049.html

Anish outlines the proposal

Mark Combellack: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00068.html

Anish moves to resolve Issue 24 with
the proposal contained in http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00068.html

Mark Combellack: Motion seconded by
Bryan

Motion passes unanimously

RESOLUTION: Issue 24 is resolved

Issue 58: SCA Spring C&I Specification
does not have a normative definition of how to calculate the ComponentType
of a Spring Application context

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-58

Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00107.html

PDF: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/33005/sca-springci-draft-20070926_Issue58d.pdf

MS Word: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/33004/sca-springci-draft-20070926_Issue58d.doc

Mike E presents the proposal

Anish I'm in the same boat as dave wrt
reference calculation

Anish - would like to see all implicit
references overridden if a <sca:reference/> is declared

COB

Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.

Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.

IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.

Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  

Email:  

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →