← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
Raw Text from SCA-J Conf call
Folks, Here is the raw text of the meeting of 19th June: - Roll Call http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/membership.php?wg_abbrev=sca-j - Appointment of scribe. List attached below - Agenda bashing - Approval of minutes for 15th June 2009 http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/32939/SCA%20Java%20Minutes%202009-06-15.doc 0. Administration - Issue Status: Open: 28 - SCA-J Public Review Started: 8th June 2009 Ends: 7th August 2009 1. Review action items: Action Items that I believe are done: Action Items that I believe are still to be done: 2008-11-11-22: Mark to draw up some wording for Direction 1 (as discussed at the November F2F) for JAVA-62 2008-11-11-23: Mark (and others prepared to help) to investigate the WorkManager JEE spec and determine its applicability to SCA for JAVA-62 2009-05-11-01: Editors: remove extra space on line 767 of CD01 (PDF) 2009-06-01-01: MikeE to raise issue regarding some Assembly tests that require Java 2009-06-05-02: Anish to raise an issue in Bindings TC against WS binding spec to address wireFormat and operationSelector pseudo-schema once the Assembly change is made to make these abstract. 2. New Issues None 3. Open Issues a. JAVA-140: Schema for @ejb-link-name is incorrect http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-140 Updated proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00021.html b. JAVA-149: SCA Spring C & I specification need to specify the limitations of implicit references http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-149 Proposal in Jira c. JAVA-150: SCA Spring C & I specification need to mention how SCA runtime should load multiple application context files. http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-150 Proposal in Jira d. JAVA-114: Spring CI runtime behaviour when annotation rules are violated http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-114 Proposal in Jira e. JAVA-24: The EJB bindings specification should provide explicity statesupport or non-support for Callbacks http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-24 Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00049.html f. JAVA-122: EJB Binding - Remove references to conversational function http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-122 Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00050.html g. JAVA-118: EJB Binding: Need description for <wireFormat/> and <operationSelection/> http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-118 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00027.html Waiting for Assembly and Binding issues to be raised and resolved Latest proposal 1: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00051.html Latest proposal 2: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00056.html h. JAVA-58: SCA Spring C&I Specification does not have a normative definition of how to calculate the ComponentType of a Spring Application context http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-58 Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00107.html PDF: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/33005/sca-springci-draft-20070926_Issue58d.pdf MS Word: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/33004/sca-springci-draft-20070926_Issue58d.doc i JAVA-164: Spring C&I SCA extension element does not provide full functionality possible in an SCA CT http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-164 Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00111.html PDF: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/33007/sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD01%2BIssue164.pdf MS Word: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/33006/sca-springci-1.1-spec-WD01%20Issue164.doc 4. Issues waiting for updated proposals a. JAVA-59: SCA Spring C & I specification does not state what happens when a Bean exposed as a service implements mutliple interfaces http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-59 Waiting for updated proposal b. JAVA-92: Spring C&I spec needs to define how effective CT is calculated http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-92 Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200905/msg00102.html Waiting for JAVA-58 to be resolved. 5. Issues with no proposals a. JAVA-163: Spring C&I sca-spring:reference element has a default attribute which is unexplained http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-163 No proposal b. JAVA-107: RFC2119 Language is needed for the EJB Binding Specification http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-107 No proposal c. JAVA-106: RFC2119 Language is needed for Spring C&I Specification http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-106 No proposal d. JAVA-63: SCA Spring C & I specification does not state whether Constructor Injection should be supported http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-63 No proposal 6. AOB a. Straggler roll call --------------------------------------------------------------- Rotating scribe list: Ron Barack SAP AG (3) Michael Beisiegel IBM (3) Sanjay Patil SAP AG (3) Jim Marino Individual (4) Pradeep Simha TIBCO Software Inc. (5) Vamsavardhana Chillakuru IBM (3) Plamen Pavlov SAP AG (2) Meeraj Kunnumpurath Individual (3) Martin Chapman Oracle Corporation (9) Yang Lei (7) Mike Edwards IBM (10) Graham Charters IBM (3) Anish Karmarkar Oracle Corporation (12) Ashok Malhotra Oracle Corporation (11) Bryan Aupperle IBM (12) Yang Lei (8 ) Simon Nash Individual (9) anonymous morphed into anish Scribe: Mike Edwards Agenda Bashin No changes Item 1 Meeting Minutes Minutes for 15th June RESOLUTION: Minutes are approved without objection Item 2 TC Admin 28 open issues Public review has started for Java CAA, Java CI specs Ends 7th August Item 3 Action Items No progress on any action items - all remain pending Item 4 New Issues No new issues Item 5 Open Issues a. JAVA-140: Schema for @ejb-link-name is incorrect http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-140 Updated proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00021.html Anish: the only issue is whether it should be string or anyURI Bryan moves to resolve Issue 140 using the proposal in the email http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00021.html Mike Edwards seconds Anish: Should this be anyURI rather than string? Mike E: This was debated on the email list as Dave started with anyURI but changed it as a result of previous discussions Bryan: Could there be a circumstance where the pointer to the JAR would not follow normal URI schemes? Motion passes unanimously RESOLUTION: Issue 140 is resolved JAVA-149: SCA Spring C & I specification need to specify the limitations of implicit references http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-149 Proposal in Jira Mike E presents the proposal Anish: The proposal is quite vague - it isn't spec language ACTION 20090619-01: Mike E to prepare a detailed proposal for Issue 149 JAVA-150: SCA Spring C & I specification need to mention how SCA runtime should load multiple application context files. http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-150 Proposal in Jira Need to get Ram on a call to present this one JAVA-114: Spring CI runtime behaviour when annotation rules are violated http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-114 Proposal in Jira Discussion of the fact that currently, there is nothing in the spec that says that SCA annotations are supported - and that a discussion on the componentType calculation indicated that an issue needs raising to add support for SCA annotations to the Spring spec JAVA-24: The EJB bindings specification should provide explicity statesupport or non-support for Callbacks http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-24 Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00049.html Anish outlines the proposal Mark Combellack: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00068.html Anish moves to resolve Issue 24 with the proposal contained in http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00068.html Mark Combellack: Motion seconded by Bryan Motion passes unanimously RESOLUTION: Issue 24 is resolved Issue 58: SCA Spring C&I Specification does not have a normative definition of how to calculate the ComponentType of a Spring Application context http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-58 Latest proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200906/msg00107.html PDF: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/33005/sca-springci-draft-20070926_Issue58d.pdf MS Word: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/33004/sca-springci-draft-20070926_Issue58d.doc Mike E presents the proposal Anish I'm in the same boat as dave wrt reference calculation Anish - would like to see all implicit references overridden if a <sca:reference/> is declared COB Yours, Mike. Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO. Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC. IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain. Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431 Email: Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →