I am in favor of this proposal and the accompanying proposal for 125.
However, lines 158-163 seem to conflict. 158-160 says that unless there is an @Remotable annotation, the service is local. But lines 161-163 introduce another possibility for defining a remotable service.
I think we may have discussed this in the last call, but don't remember what we decided to do about it.
Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:
Simon Nash ---06/08/2009 06:53:37 AM---I am attaching an update to the proposed resolution for JAVA-153, incorporating the changes agreed o
From:
Simon Nash <>
To:
OASIS Java <>
Date:
06/08/2009 06:53 AM
Subject:
[sca-j] JAVA-153: Updated proposed resolution
I am attaching an update to the proposed resolution for JAVA-153,
incorporating the changes agreed on last Monday's call.
Simon
(See attached file: sca-javaci-1.1-spec-cd01+issue153-rev2.doc)---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
sca-javaci-1.1-spec-cd01+issue153-rev2.doc
