meeting minutes - June 6, 2011

[11:03] Mike Edwards: 1. Roll call 

2. Scribe appointment 

Scribe list attached below 

3. Agenda bashing 

4. Meeting Minutes 

Minutes of 2011-05-23 telcon: 

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/201105/msg00042.html 

5. TC Administrivia 

a. Recording issue status - 8 open, 0 new 

6. ACTION ITEMS 

2011-05-09-2: Mike to fix editorial problems with the TC document & make proposal for Issue 238 

PENDING 

2011-05-23-1: Anish to send a request to the SCA-Assembly TC wrt updating the RDDL and the XSD for spring CI 

PENDING 

7. Planning for PR of various specs 

a) CAA spec: apply issue 233 

b) CAA TA: apply issue 235, apply issue 232 

c) CAA TC: apply issues 215? & 234 

d) POJO spec: apply issue 231 

e) POJO TA: apply issue 236 

f) POJO TC: apply issue 222, ref udpate(?) 

g) Spring: DONE 

h) Spring TC: WD01 ready, need edits to remove JMS-isms + issue 238 

8. CSD01 issues 

a) What should the subdirectory be named? 

opencsa/sca-j/sca-springci/v1.1 OR opencsa/sca-j/springci/v1.1 ? 

9. New Issues (requires 2/3) 

NONE 

10. Issues with proposals 

NONE 

11. Issues waiting for updated proposals (Spring/EJB/JEE) 

a. Issue 238 TA and TC needed for SPR30005 

http://osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-238 

Awating proposal from Mike 

b. Issue 239 JCI90003 -- Java SE 5 requirement should be on the runtime not on the class 

http://osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-239 

Consensus is to allow versions higher than 5. What is the minimum? 5 or 6? How easy is it to run our tests with version 5? Awating action from Mike. 

c. JAVA-109: Property and reference names computed from SCA annotations in web modules not specified explicitly 

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-109 

Proposal in Jira 

Waiting for updated proposal (Vamsi) 

d. JAVA-174: Consider portlets in the SCA JEE specification 

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-174 

e. JAVA-91: Java EE Spec: Need to define the derivation of the name of a component contributed to the Domain by an application.composite file 

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-91 

Waiting for updated proposal (Mike) 

f. JAVA-93: JEE Integration spec needs to define how effective CT is calculated 

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-93 

Waiting for updated proposal (Anish) 

g. JAVA-108: RFC2119 Language is needed for the SCA-JEE Specification 

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-108 

Waiting for updated proposal 

h. JAVA-88: Java EE Spec: The @archive attribute of the implementation.jee element needs fixing 

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-88 

No proposal 

Plamen to check whether on his informal JEE issues list 

12. AOB 

a. straggler role 

13. Spec status 

CAA (part of 1st batch of 1.1 specs): 

2 new issue, 2nd PR ended 2010-12-08, CSD05 expected to be final CSD 

1st impl: Tuscany (compliant), 2nd impl: ?? 

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/201012/msg00000.htmlhttp://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/201012/msg00000.htmlTA: CD01 PR ended 2010-10-24, 0 open issue, CSD02 expected to be final CSD 

TC: CD01 PR ended 2010-10-24, 0 open issue, CSD02 expected to be final CSD 

POJO (part of 1st batch of 1.1 specs): 

0 open issues, 2st PR ended 2010-12-08, CSD03 expected to be final CSD 

1st impl: Tuscany (compliant), 2nd impl: ?? 

TA: CSD01 PR ended 2010-12-23 

TC: CDS01 PR ended 2010-12-23 

EJB Binding (not part of 1st batch of 1.1 specs): 

0 open issues, 1st PR done, CSD03 expected to be final CSD 

1st impl: ??, 2nd impl: ?? 

TA: WD stage, no CSD yet, 60 day PR needed 

TC: WD stage, no CSD yet, 60 day PR needed 

Spring C&I (not part of 1st batch of 1.1 specs): 

1st CSD undergoing 30 day PR 

1st impl: ??, 2nd impl: ?? 

TA/TC: WD01 available 

JEE (not part of 1st batch of 1.1 specs): 

6 open issues, WD stage (not actively worked on), no CSD yet, 60 day PR needed 

1st impl: ??, 2nd impl: ?? 

TA: no work done 

TC: no work done

[11:04] anish: Date: 2011-06-06

[11:05] anish: Scribe: Dave Booz

[11:06] Dave Booz: scribe: Dave Booz

[11:06] Dave Booz: topic: agenda bashing

[11:07] Dave Booz: no changes to posted agenda

[11:07] Dave Booz: topic: meeting mins approval

[11:08] Dave Booz: mins approved without changes

[11:13] Dave Booz: topic: administrivia

[11:14] Dave Booz: discussion on URL names for the spring CI spec - we're adhering to the new naming guidelines for this spec

[11:16] Dave Booz: the only thing we get to pick in the URL is the abbreviation of the work product

[11:16] Dave Booz: topic: AI

[11:18] Dave Booz: all AIs are still pending

[11:19] Dave Booz: meeting is quorate with 4 of 6 voting members

[11:20] Dave Booz: topic: Issues

[11:21] Dave Booz: Issue 238 TA and TC needed for SPR30005 

http://osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-238

[11:21] Dave Booz: Mike still working on this

[11:21] Dave Booz: Issue 239 JCI90003 -- Java SE 5 requirement should be on the runtime not on the class 

http://osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-239

[11:24] Dave Booz: Mike - default run scripts in test suite are depending on java 6 - but these scripts are not normative nor required to be used

[11:26] Dave Booz: Anish - we should stick to Java5 as a minimum

[11:26] Dave Booz: Mike - need to change text if we want to allow higher than 5 and we need to change the target of the conformance to the runtime, not the app class

[11:28] Dave Booz: Anish - let's work on the text now to resolve this

[11:28] anish: The Java class referenced by the @class attribute of <implementation.java/> MUST conform to Java SE version 5.0. [JCI90003]

[11:31] Dave Booz: Mike - does this req. even need to be stated given CAA requirements

[11:31] Dave Booz: Anish - would like at least some simple statement, even if it's not a compliance stmt

[11:36] anish: As a result of the requirements above the SCA Runtime has to be based on Java SE 5 or above

[11:37] anish: For information, as a result of the requirements above the SCA Runtime has to be based on Java SE 5 or above

[11:38] anish: and remove JCI90003 from the main spec and TC docment

[11:39] Mike Edwards: Mike moves to resolve issue 239 by a) removing JCI90003 from the main spec and from the TestCases document and b) adding the following text as a new paragraph at the end of section 11.3: "For information, as a result of the requirements above the SCA Runtime has to be based on Java SE 5 or above."

[11:40] Dave Booz: seconded by Dave

[11:41] Dave Booz: resolution: motion passes without objection to resolve JAVA-239

[11:43] Dave Booz: ACTION: Mike - update the POJO work products with remaining resolved issues

[11:44] Dave Booz: ACTION: All - Examine CAA spec for optional aspects

[11:44] Dave Booz: topic: closing

[11:45] Dave Booz: no stragglers

[11:45] Dave Booz: meeting adjourned

Dave Booz

STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture

Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC

"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"

Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093  or  8-295-6093

e-mail: