Hi Mike:
I'm sympathetic to this proposal but I want to make sure I understand it
completely.
If I have an intent attached to a SCDL element, that intent must be
satisfied either by a policy in a policySet
that is directly attached to the SCDL element or a policySet using the
external attachment mechanism.
If this is correct, it does not address the usecase where I have a set
of corporate policies that specify how
encryption, authentication etc. must be done but do not need to be
mentioned explicitly. They are pulled
in at deployment time to address appropriate intents and can be changed
independently of the SCDL.
I think this is a significant usecase.
All the best, Ashok
Mike Edwards wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> Here is the alternative proposal for Issue 15 that we have been
> working on:
>
>
>
> Yours, Mike.
>
> Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
> Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
> IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
> Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
> Email:
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> /
> /
>
> /Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
> number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
> 3AU/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
