Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [sdd] RE: SDD OASIS Standard Submission

From
Randy George <>
Date
2008-06-13T18:32:44+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [sdd] RE: SDD OASIS Standard Submission
I think that the TC needs to think hard
about a 1.1 rev of the standard.  I can not take another round of
this process.

Regards,

Randy George

Senior Technical Staff Member

Tivoli Software, IBM Software Group

Austin, TX  

(512) 838-0752     T/L 678-0752

From:
"Mary McRae" <>

To:
Brent Miller/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS

Cc:
<>

Date:
06/13/08 01:22 PM

Subject:
[sdd] RE: SDD OASIS Standard Submission

Hi Brent,

 

  The first thing
we have to do is to run a Special Majority ballot for the TC to approve
submitting the specification for OASIS Standard ballot – remember we couldn’t
do this until we had the three statements of use; once that ballot has
been approved you can then submit for OS vote, but you won’t make the
15 June cutoff date since it’s a 7-day ballot.

 

Here’s what I need right
now: links to the actual email that included the statements of use

 

Here’s what I’ll need
for the actual submission: the submission in the body of an email message
rather than a word document.

 

Thanks!

 

Mary

 

From: Brent Miller [mailto:]

Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 2:11 PM

To: Mary McRae

Cc: 

Subject: SDD OASIS Standard Submission

Importance: High

 

Mary, 

The OASIS SDD TC has received the necessary three statements of use and
so now seeks to submit our approved Committee Specification to the Membership
of OASIS for consideration as an OASIS Standard.

The attached document contains all of the required information and pointers
to documents according to the OASIS TC process.

Could you please review and verify this information and initiate the OASIS
Standard approval process? 

Please let me know if you need more information.

Thank you. 

Regards,

Brent

Brent A. Miller

Senior Technical Staff Member

Lead Architect, Autonomic Computing

IBM Corp.

Tel. 919-543-6959 (TIE 441)

"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But,
in practice, there is." 

-- Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut
Next in thread → Next in month →