RE: A question on Profiles

Hi Kirk,

 

I thought I had cleaned up the namespaces in my last submission,
but it looks that I did not.  I’ll get that corrected and upload the
new version.

 

Cheers,

-Jason

 

From: Wilson, Kirk D
[mailto:] 

Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 3:19 PM

To: Brent Miller

Cc: 

Subject: [sdd] A question on Profiles

 

Quick
question if I may on the current examples provided with the N10 Profile Revisit
Proposal:

 

Cim-profiles.xsd
defines a namespace: http://docs.oasis-open.org/sdd/ns/cim-profile

 

However,
the SimpleAppClient.xml file specifies a canonical WS-CIM namespace for the
CIM_Resources profile: http://schemas.dmtf.org/wbem/wscim/1.0.0/cim-schema/2.19.0/.
 I don’t understand this, because the cim-profiles.xsd has no
similarity to the WS-CIM spec.  For example, the CIM class names that
cim-profiles.xsd defines as types are declared as elements in a WS-CIM
conformant scheme.  So there is a major mismatch between the namespaces.

 

Should
the namespace in the SimpleAppClient SDD xml correspond to the targetNamespace
of cim-profiles.xsd?  If not, I would appreciate an explanation of what is
going on.

 

Kirk
Wilson, Ph.D.

CA,
Inc.

Research
Staff Member, CA Labs

Council for
Technical Excellence

Tele:
603 823 7146  (preferred)

Cell: 603
991 8873

Fax:
603 823 7148



 

This e-mail may
contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient of this communication, please delete this e-mail and notify
the sender immediately.