AW: [sdo] NEW ISSUE: Mapping of signed and unsigned integer values

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/SDO-139

 

Hi Bryan,

 

Assuming we are quorate, I'll add this to today's agenda, 
sorry for forgetting.

To which scope item would you assign this?  
XmlFidelity?

 

 

Ron

 

Von: Bryan Aupperle [mailto:] 

Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. August 2008 19:19
An: 

Betreff: [sdo] NEW ISSUE: Mapping of signed 
and unsigned integer values

Target: Core specification WD-01 
Section 6.1, 7.4, and 8.1 
    
        Java specification WD-02 Section 7.1, and 
8.3? 
          
  C++ specification WD-02 Section 8.1

Description: 

Currently the SDO type Byte 
is defined as an 8-bit unsigned integer, while Short, Int, and Long are 
16, 32 and 64 bit signed integers respectively 
Why are 
the not any SDO types for unsigned 16, 32, and 64 bit integers (which are 
valid XSD types)?  Or for that matter an 8-bit signed integer (which 
is what XSD:byte is)? 

A related concern the mapping of 
XSD:byte to SDO Byte appears to be an error since -123 would be a valid value in 
the XML document but not in the SDO instance. 

Proposal: 

Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.
STSM, WebSphere Enterprise 
Platform Software Solution Architect

Research Triangle Park,  NC 

+1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)
Internet Address: