I have attached a couple of diagrams that I made. They use a different
notation; rather than being true class diagrams, they are "elm tree
diagrams" (a notation I use in my DTD methodology) with elements,
attributes, and cardinality clearly marked in an XML-ish fashion. If you
think I should publish the legend, let me know; I just ran out of time.
I'm sorry I didn't get time to try turning the core-0.7 proposal into a
similar diagram. If there's interest, I can try to do that later this week.
Eve
At 12:33 AM 6/11/01 -0400, Orchard, David wrote:
>Eve and I didn't quite manage to synch up stuff this past week. I'm
>submitting what I worked on earlier to fulfill my action item and allow us a
>clearer picture for our assertions discussions.
>
>I have attached a word document with 3 different diagrams:
>1) toppish assertions with recursive structure - assertionPackages can
>contain other packages
>2) toppish assertions with non-recursive 3 layer structure
>3) Assertions 0.7 draft.
