Bob,
This is an open issue from the f2f#3 meeting
(ISSUE:[F2F#3-37]). The general sense seemed to
be that people wanted to be able to omit the
namespace and that somehow there was a canonical namespace
in which names are interpreted (SAML namespace?).
I dont think we actually spelled this out completely.
- prateek
>>
>>In the AttributeNameType structure, AttributeNamespace has minimum
>>cardinality zero; does this mean that
>>the AttributeName is drawn from a canonical default namespace
>>(if so, do we
>>specify what this namespace is)?
>>Or does it permit ambiguity of reference. If the latter, I'm
>>nervous....
>>
>>Here's the structure I'm referring to:
>>
>><complexType name="AttributeNameType">
>> <element ref="AttributeName">
>> <element ref="AttributeNamespace" minOccurs="0">
>></complexType>
>>
>>
>>--bob
>>
>>
