Sanity Check

So, these are three examples that I threw together that validate against the
current schema proposals (with one minor change that I am currently
discussing with Phil on another thread *).

They should give you an idea of what SAML Assertions will look like under
the current proposal. Can you please look these over and tell me if they
represent what we all think the schema currently expresses? Or,
alternatively, if I have failed to grasp something in creating the examples,
that would also be a good thing to know.

I haven't done an example of the Assertion List yet, but I may do one after
whatever discussion we have about these is done.

Don't worry about the namespace locators in the <Assertion> element.
Ultimately they will point to where we publicly make the SAML schemas
available, but for now they just point to copies of the schema on my
desktop.

C.

(* at present the Assertion element has a type that cannot be instantiated
because it is explicitly marked as abstract. I believe this is just an
artefact of a previous schema where we has multiple Assertion types rather
than multiple Statement types. The minor change is removing the
"abstract=true" declaration from the AssertionType definition.)