RE: Bindings Committee Recommendation: SAML HTTP Binding should b e mandatory-to-implement

> BEA strongly believes in option #2, and will vote that way if 
> asked.  This 
> is not a marketing "buzz" but real need.

I am also inclined towards #2, but I would like to hear your reasons. Since
the Binding has only to do with the exchange of SAML requests and responses
between SAML-aware parties, it can not be a need for interoperability with
existing SOAP applications.

Hal