[security-services] Minutes for SSTC Focus Group, Tuesday Oct 30

(Editorial note:  Apologies, but these minutes are thin.  If anyone has
any detail to contribute where noted below, please send it to me and I
will incorporate it.)

Minutes for SSTC Focus Group, Tuesday Oct 30
Dial in info: +1 334 262 0740 #856956
Minutes taken by Steve Anderson

----------------------------
Prateek: Security props of assertion handles
- Continues

----------------------------
Tim. Simon, prateek:  Sec props of artifacts
- Closed

----------------------------
Simon:  Query refinement
- Deferred to F2F#5
- Needs time at F2F

----------------------------
Prateek:  SenderVouches sec model
- Closed
- Soap profile has been created, sent out for review

----------------------------
Irving to Bob: received no response on question of SubjectConfirmation
    - Bob responded last week?
    - "SubjectConfirmation" is agreed to be a bad name, but no better
      name has presented itself

    <<< MISSING DETAIL HERE >>>

----------------------------
Scott:  status codes
- Sent mail to list
- Question is whether status codes are/should be bindings-specific
    - Could either tunnel the codes, as is represented now, or think of
      it as an extension to the transport mech, like SOAP
    - Simon: using SOAP mech makes other bindings messy
    - Needs more discussion
    - BobB would like to see a proposal put on the table

----------------------------
Prateek:  NameIdentifier
- Concludes that there is no compelling interop question here.  Business

  agreement will be sufficient.
- Withdraws from championing this
- Scott Cantor, RLBob agree.

----------------------------
Phill’s request to consider Eve’s restructuring proposal
- No real reaction from list
- Leave open

NEW ISSUES
- None

--
Steve Anderson
OpenNetwork Technologies

727-561-9500 x241