Re: [security-services] Recommendation: SAML elements shouldbefullyqualified

I was objecting to this comment from email by Prateek
> I guess another way of putting this is a recommendation
>to avoid use of SAML elements while making some assumption
>about the default namespace.

*Of course* SAML is defining elements (and attributes) in the SAML
namespace. If the document says more than that, I believe it runs the
risk of confusing people.  It's like saying "element names must be
prefixed with less-than"
	/r$
-- 
Zolera Systems, Your Key to Online Integrity
Securing Web services: XML, SOAP, Dig-sig, Encryption
http://www.zolera.com