Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [security-services] draft-sstc-bindings-07.doc

From
Emily Xu <>
Date
2001-12-10T18:39:53+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [security-services] draft-sstc-bindings-07.doc
Hi Prateek,

One comment:

Section 7.2.0.3 Message Integrity:
	Current wording means message integrity is mandatory when using the SOAP 
binding over HTTP. Is this the intention? If it's not, I'd like it to be 
modified to something similar to the one in section 7.2.0.4. The proposed 
wording is:
	
	When message integrity is required, SAML receivers MUST implement 
message integrity by utilizing HTTP over SSLv3 or TLS1.0[AppendixC] with a 
server-side certificate.

Thanks,	
Emily

> Content-return: allowed
> Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 19:33:31 -0500
> From: "Mishra, Prateek" <>
> Subject: [security-services] draft-sstc-bindings-07.doc
> To: "''" 
<>
> List-Owner: <mailto:>
> List-Post: <mailto:>
> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>, 
<mailto:?body=subscribe>
> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>, 
<mailto:?body=unsubscribe>
> List-Archive: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services>
> List-Help: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/elists/admin.shtml>, 
<mailto:?body=help>
> List-Id: <security-services.lists.oasis-open.org>
> 
> Review comments are requested by end of day, Wednesday, December 12.
>  
>  
> - prateek
>  
>  
>
Next in thread → Next in month →