IIRC, Martin Gudgin had knocked out a XML Schema REC
compliant schema for SOAP1.1. Yes, here is the announcement:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Jul/0074.html
Cheers,
Chris
Rich Salz wrote:
>> My question, I guess, is whether or not any SOAP processors one might
>> use to construct a SAML request are likely to embed xmlns:xsd or
>> xmlns:xsi anywhere, possibly referencing 1999 (since that's SOAP 1.1's
>> timeframe)?
>
>
>
>
> Most of the SOAP implementations I know declare the schema and
> schema-instance namespaces.
>
> While SOAP1.1 officially points to an obsolete draft of the XMLSchema
> standard, the consensus among the soap interoperability folks (the
> soapbuilders mailing list at yahoogroups), is to use SOAP 1.1 with the
> official Schema standard. Many will accept any of three XML Schema
> URI's, and try to generate a reply in the same namespace, but that is
> considered an interim measure.
>
> I think you'll see no pushback from the SOAP developers community if you
> specify SOAP 1.1 with the XML Schema NS.
> /r$
