Agreed. I dont think there is any intention here to
ignore external reviews. I would propose that one or more
individuals be assigned to work thru the comments and act
as interlocutors.
- prateek
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Stephen Farrell [mailto:]
>>Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 6:59 AM
>>To: oasis sstc
>>Subject: Re: [security-services] Minutes for Telecon, Tuesday Jan 22,
>>2002
>>
>>
>>
>>Bob,
>>
>>> - RLBob: referring to msg from Stephen Farrell, unless some voting
>>> member picks up items from his msg and champion them,
>>they will not
>>> become issues for consideration before going to last call
>>
>>While that's fair enough (esp. since I could be a voting member if
>>I wanted), I would assume that the editors will review and take
>>account of all substantive comments received, and handle them as
>>appropriate (creating an issue or whatever). Otherwise, why ask for
>>external review?
>>
>>Stephen.
>>
>>
>>--
>>____________________________________________________________
>>Stephen Farrell
>>Baltimore Technologies, tel: (direct line) +353 1 881 6716
>>39 Parkgate Street, fax: +353 1 881 7000
>>Dublin 8. mailto:
>>Ireland http://www.baltimore.com
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------
>>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>>
