Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [security-services] SAML Outreach Whitepaper

From
Simon Godik <>
Date
2002-01-07T19:01:42+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [security-services] SAML Outreach Whitepaper
Title: RE: [security-services] SAML Outreach Whitepaper

Darren, this is very good overview.

I think SAML bindings section needs to be clarified with

respect to bindings and profiles.

Simon Godik

-----Original Message-----

From: Platt, Darren [mailto:]

Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:54 AM

To: ''

Subject: [security-services] SAML Outreach Whitepaper

Attached you will find a draft of the SAML whitepaper I've been working on.

It still needs some wordsmithing - any suggestions are welcome.  

I tried to keep this high-level enough to hit the 'lowest common

denominator' among its readers.  I think a lot of people will be focusing on

how SAML fits their business requirements(esp. project liberty members) and

not all of them will be very technical, and some of them will not have a

background in security.  So I wanted to beat them over the head a little bit

with the business relevence - let me know if you think too much.  Also

didn't want to get too detailed on the technology so as to scare those

people off.  

I probably have to work on consistency in the tense (future vs. present)

I've used.  I think it's probably best to talk about SAML in present tense -

in other words saying "SAML does ...", instead of "SAML will do ..." - but

I'm not sure.  Is there a commonly used convention for this that I don't

know about?  

I was also thinking of putting the producer/consumer (Domain) model in an

appendix too - anybody think that would be too much info?

Any better or additional examples (about how SAML will be used) you may have

would be great.  Also please let me know if you have any suggestions for the

examples that are in there as well.

I still need to make sure the example assertions (in the Appendix) are still

accurate - 'borrowed' them from Eve's presentation so not sure how dated

they are.

I guess I should include a "Reference" or "Further Reading" section with:

        - OASIS website

        - SSTC home page

        - SSTC Docs Page

        - Core 21, Bindings 7

        - Producer/Consumer-Domain Model

        - anything else?

Should I say anything about SAML's status?

Thanks,

Darren

------------

Darren Platt

Technical Evangelist

RSA Security

direct: 415.652.2677

Next in thread → Next in month →