Please use the more common spelling: "Requester". This is the spelling
used in the specs.
At 10:12 AM 1/9/02 -0800, Simon Godik wrote:
>Scott,
>
>This is good status code proposal.
>
>I think it is better to use samlp:Requestor and samlp:Responder in
>samlp:StatusCodeEnumType definition rather
>than samlp:Sender and samlp:Receiver. Also, we can also refer to 'saml
>requestor' and 'saml responder' in the descriptive
>
>text.
...
--
Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center eve.maler @ sun.com
