RE: [security-services] Current doc status

Bob,

I would strongly suggest we push this out to last call. I think it will make
things too
tough to add it right now. 

- prateek

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: RL 'Bob' Morgan [mailto:]
>>Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:06 PM
>>To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
>>Cc: Security-Services (E-mail)
>>Subject: Re: [security-services] Current doc status
>>
>>
>>
>>On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
>>
>>> * Action items from con-call applied
>>> * Scott Cantor's editorial nits applied
>>> * Fixed RespondWith defined values to be fragments so as to 
>>strictly comply
>>> with anyURI syntax
>>>
>>> Remaining to apply
>>>
>>> * Fix for resource text [in discussion]
>>> * Explanatory text to explain RespondWith usage.
>>>
>>> If anyone has additional changes to propose before the next 
>>release of the
>>> doc they MUST send them to me or the list before 6pm EST tommorow
>>> [Thursday]. I will be sending out the proposed 'last call' 
>>draft on Thursday
>>> evening.
>>
>>FYI, I sent proposed text for the change to the POST profile (send
>>Response rather than Assertion) to Phillip and Prateek yesterday.
>>
>> - RL "Bob"
>>
>>
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------
>>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>>