Re: [security-services] Issues Status

From
Simon Godik <>
Date
2002-02-14T22:18:22+00:00
ID
016301c1b5a4$b42ce670$6401a8c0@C908876A
Thread
Re: [security-services] Issues Status
Title: Issues Status

Hal, I agree with your resolutions on my issues, 
which is 'defer'

Simon

  
----- Original Message ----- 

  
From: 
  Hal Lockhart 

  
To:  
  

  
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 1:12 
  PM

  
Subject: [security-services] Issues 
  Status

  

  
Here is the current status report. 

  
Irving, Prateek, Eve, Phill, Polar, RL Bob, Scott,Simon and 
  Rob you are listed as Champions for issues. Please confirm that you agree with 
  my assessment of the status.

  
Document Authors look at the Red items and see if you need to 
  make a change to close the issue. 

  
Ones I think are about to fall thru the cracks: 

  
I don't think the Empty Strings issue has been resolved or did 
  I miss that? 

  
I think the spec should say that no attributes in an attribute 
  query means "all the attributes you are entitled to see."  If this is not 
  acceptable, I think it should at least say "the intended meaning is that all 
  attributes available by policy should be returned. An implementation may not 
  interpret this request as asking for no attributes."

  
We still do not have a "Bearer" Subject Confirmation method, 
  even though the bindings spec says there is one. 

  
Hal