RE: [security-services] new text for conformance related to unbou ndedelements

> From: Robert Griffin [mailto:]

> i've attached a proposed revision to the text related
> to the issue of nested unbounded elements. It looked to
> me like there were three ways to address this issue:
...
> - Allow an application or implementation to restrict a
> request, response or assertion (in the Post profile) to
> contain no more than whatever limit we suggest as
> required for conformance, but all individual unbounded
> elements must support the same minimum.
> The last is what i've written up in the attached
> "unbounded_new.doc" and will include in the revised
> conformance spec that i'll send out this weekend. But
> suggestions are very welcome!
> bob

The new text resolves my issue; it looks fine to me.

 - irving -


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended 
for the addressee(s) only.  If you have received this message in error or 
there are any problems please notify the originator immediately.  The 
unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is 
strictly forbidden. Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct, 
special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the 
contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being 
passed on.

 
This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by 
Baltimore MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including
computer viruses.