RE: [security-services] FW: [security-services-comment] XNS vs. S AML

For some background reading..:

http://weblog.digital-identity.info/archives/000075.html 
 - and -
http://weblog.digital-identity.info/archives/000020.html

The elementary learning is that XNS is going nowhere. OneName, the company
holding the XNS patents, filed a last defensive move by joining Liberty in
the hope they could make their voice sound there.
http://weblog.digital-identity.info/archives/000056.html

Regards,
Nikolaj

-----Original Message-----
From: Hal Lockhart
To: 
Sent: 6/24/2002 7:47 PM
Subject: [security-services] FW: [security-services-comment] XNS vs. SAML

Is anyone familiar with XNS or OneName? 

Hal 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Matan Safriel [ mailto:
<mailto:> ] 
Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 10:41 AM 
To:  
Subject: [security-services-comment] XNS vs. SAML 


Hi, 


Is XNS a separate effort unsupported by oasis and the SAML effort and 
what parts of SAML replace the XNS protocol and capabilities ? 

Is XNS mutually exclusive with the SAML protocol ? 

(Is there a reference from oasis publications to the XNS "identity
protocol" 
?) 

Thanks, 

   Matan 

_________________________________________________________________ 
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
<http://mobile.msn.com>  


---------------------------------------------------------------- 
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription 
manager: < http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl
<http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> >