RE: [security-services] Proposed DoNotCache Condition

From
Scott Cantor <>
Date
2002-11-06T02:08:06+00:00
ID
003401c28539$14d245b0$01fea8c0@SAIDIN
Thread
RE: [security-services] Proposed DoNotCache Condition
>But the SSO Assertion can contain attribute statements. Since
Authorization
>decisions may be based on those attributes, it would be nice to know
that
>they are expected to change soon. However, this is not the use case I
am
>really interested in. (see below)

Ok, but if you think about it, putting other statements in the SSO
assertion has some serious problems. The assertion has to be short
lived, so it doesn't seem very practical.

OTOH, one could embed an additional assertion with different validity in
the samlp:Response, and that seems to have the semantics one would want.
The SSO assertion is rendered invalid quickly, but the additional data
can last however long is proper.

-- Scott