RE: [security-services] Bindings and Profiles errata

Rob - 

Items 1-3 have 
already been reported by Fredrick Hirsch of Nokia and exist in the current 
draft of the errata document. I have added items 4 and 5.

 

Thanks,

Jahan

----------------
Jahan Moreh
Chief Security 
Architect
310.286.3070 

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Philpott, Robert 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 
  1:55 PM
To: 
  ''
Subject: 
  [security-services] Bindings and Profiles errata

  

  
    
Line 258: s/Section 
    3.1.2.2/Section 3.1.3.2/ 
    
Line 263: s/Section 
    3.1.2.3/Section 3.1.3.3/ 
    
Line 267: s/Section 
    3.1.2.4/Section 3.1.3.4/ 
    
Line 291: The section number is 
    not bolded as are all other section numbers. 
    
Section 5.3: Even though it 
    isn't explicitly stated, I have been assuming that the "...:cm:artifact-01" 
    refers to a type 1 artifact.  If so, doesn't there need to be a 
    corresponding confirmation method identifier for "...:cm:artifact-02"? 
     Is there really a need to distinguish the artifact types (i.e. "just 
    use "...:cm:artifact")?  We should also be explicit as to whether 
    providing the actual artifact in the ConfirmationData is required, optional, 
    or not permitted - Which is it? 

  
 

  
Rob 
  Philpott 
  
RSA 
  Security Inc. 
  
The Most 
  Trusted Name in e-Security 
Tel: 
  781-515-7115 
Mobile: 
  617-510-0893 
Fax: 
  781-515-7020 
mailto: 
  

  
 

 

----------------
Jahan Moreh
Chief Security 
Architect
310.286.3070 

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Jahan Moreh 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 3:23 
  PM
To: Philpott, Robert; 
  ''
Subject: RE: 
  [security-services] Bindings and Profiles errata

  
Rob - 
  

  
Items 1-3 have 
  already been reported by Fredrick Hirsch of Nokia and exist in the 
  current draft of the errata document. I have added items 4 and 
  5.

  
 

  
Thanks,

  
Jahan

  
 

  
 

  
----------------
Jahan Moreh
Chief Security 
  Architect
310.286.3070 

  
    
-----Original Message-----
From: Philpott, Robert 
    [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 
    1:55 PM
To: 
    ''
Subject: 
    [security-services] Bindings and Profiles errata

    

    
      
Line 258: s/Section 
      3.1.2.2/Section 3.1.3.2/ 
      
Line 263: s/Section 
      3.1.2.3/Section 3.1.3.3/ 
      
Line 267: s/Section 
      3.1.2.4/Section 3.1.3.4/ 
      
Line 291: The section number 
      is not bolded as are all other section numbers. 
      
Section 5.3: Even though it 
      isn't explicitly stated, I have been assuming that the 
      "...:cm:artifact-01" refers to a type 1 artifact.  If so, doesn't 
      there need to be a corresponding confirmation method identifier for 
      "...:cm:artifact-02"?  Is there really a need to distinguish the 
      artifact types (i.e. "just use "...:cm:artifact")?  We should also be 
      explicit as to whether providing the actual artifact in the 
      ConfirmationData is required, optional, or not permitted - Which is 
      it? 

    
 

    
Rob 
    Philpott 
    
RSA 
    Security Inc. 
    
The Most 
    Trusted Name in e-Security 
Tel: 
    781-515-7115 
Mobile: 
    617-510-0893 
Fax: 
    781-515-7020 
mailto: