RE: [security-services] RE: [saml-dev] ACTION-ITEM: Addition of IDattributes to SAML 1.0 elements in SAML 1.1

> Lastly, based on a very informal statistics (i.e., my own experience) not
> too many people actually turn on schema validation. 

This turns out to be a fairly contentious issue. My polling runs about 50-50, with people on both sides very surprised that their
position isn't considered "obvious common sense".

FWIW, I validate, and don't find XML to be of much value in implementing something like SAML if I don't.

But that's why the idea of changing a published schema w/o changing the namespace causes so much debate.

-- Scott