> Hmm, yeah. I was hoping that they would just be illustrative of the
> mechanics of how you extend SAML types to do your own thing, and looking
> at XTAML at this point would probably just be confusing. Do you think
> Liberty would serve all right in this capacity?
I think *parts* of Liberty do, but some parts end up confusing a person if they don't have time to look deeper.
Extending Request and Response can throw one for a loop, for example, whereas extending Subject or AuthenticationStatement is more
in keeping with the point you're trying to make.
1.2 goes a little farther along those lines, with several new Statements, for example.
-- Scott
