I've tried to deal with these comments, but somehow got a little lost in
the line numbering (can't match your numbers up with either the
track-changes-on or -off versions of core-06).
Mishra, Prateek wrote:
> line 1352
>
> replace , by .
Can't find this one; perhaps fixed by Rob's comments as well!
> 1355-1357 suggests that minor versions are backwards compatible. This is not
> in
> fact the case with SAML 1.1. Should we call attention to that SAML 1.1 is
> not backwards
> compatible with SAML 1.0 admittedly in only a very narrow aspect of the
> schema.
I've attempted to clarify this.
> 1398 Is there some additional context here? How can we
> prevent a SAML requestor from arbitrarily issuing such a
> request?
Couldn't find this one.
> 1533 Can we identify a specific attribute names here?
If I'm right about the region you mean, I believe we do list the three
"identifier attribute" names already.
Eve
--
Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 354 9441
Web Technologies and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com
