Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [security-services] New draft of SAML FAQ
Thanks for the comments! Updated version attached. (V2.0 goal statement unchanged so far; please see my other message about this.) Eve Philpott, Robert wrote: > Thank you for pulling this together folks... nice job. A couple of > minor comments: > > 1. *Q: *Will SAML PDPs need to be configured to understand only selected > authentication decision queries? > > [Rob] This should be "authorization", not "authentication" > > > > 2. In the answer to "*Q: *What is the connection between acts of > authentication and SAML authentication assertions?", "public key > associated with signature on a document" should be "public key > associated with ***a*** signature on a document". > > > > 3. The answer to "*Q: *How does SAML protect against "man-in-the-middle" > and "replay" security attacks in general?" starts with "SAML doesn't > really do anything "in general".". The initial impression is that they > weren't taken into account, which isn't true. The specs provides > guidance on things that deal with attack detection/avoidance such as > uniqueness of identifiers, a requirement that requests by artifact must > be received from the site for which the artifact was generated, etc. I > think it is accurate to say something like "The SAML assertions and > protocol schemas were developed with various types of security attacks > in mind and include several mechanisms useful in mitigating such > attacks." And then continue with the "Profiles..." sentences. > > > > That's it for now... Now back to my vacation deck project... -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 354 9441 Web Products, Technologies, and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com ********************************************************************** SunNetwork 2003 Conference and Pavilion http://www.sun.com/sunnetwork September 16-18, 2003 Moscone Center, San Francisco An unparalleled event in network computing! Make the net work for you!
Next in thread →
Next in month →