Tony
The
LECP work item has been discussed and accepted by the SSTC as a work item for
some time. We have voted to move it forward.
Many
members of the TC see the value of the work and that it clearly is a relevant
SAML profile.
I'm
not sure I understand the value of further TC discussion since it is clear that
this work item is important to many TC members.
I
appreciate your concern on other approaches and believe that work
items have been proposed to meet your requirements more closely. This is
not inconsistent since different profiles allow different use
cases.
regards, Frederick
Frederick Hirsch
Nokia Mobile
Phones
-----Original Message-----
From: ext Anthony Nadalin
[mailto:]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 9:43
PM
To:
Subject: RE:
[security-services] Proposed Agenda for SSTC Conference Call, Dec
23
Frederick,
I have a couple of issues:
(1) seems like a
profile that another group like OMA takes up (but have not seen a requirement
there either)
(2) seems to rely on a "proxy" that seems to be out of scope
of SAML and thus seems like issue #1 may be where the profile and proxy can be
provided
(3) seems there is nothing specific to SAML (value add) thus seems
like issue #1 may be where the profile best done
Anthony Nadalin | work
512.436.9568 | cell 512.289.4122
"
src="gif00044.gif"
width=16><>
<>
12/22/2003 07:47 AM
To:
<>
cc:
Subject: RE:
[security-services] Proposed Agenda for SSTC Conference Call, Dec
23
> Solution Proposals for review
on Dec 23:
> ----------------------------------------
>
>
W-5a: LECP Solution Proposal
This LECP Solution proposal may be found
at:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security/download.php/3802/03-09-18-lecp-proposal-v4.pdf
regards,
Frederick
Frederick Hirsch
Nokia Mobile
Phones
