As discussed on the call - it may turn out that many/most of the profiles
will require use of metadata. In terms of the Kerberos profile I have to
say I don't know - not until we drill down a bit further.
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Cantor [mailto:]
> Sent: 19 December 2003 19:59
> To: 'Anthony Nadalin';
> Subject: RE: [security-services] Roles for SAML 2.0 Metadata
>
>
> >Why is this restricted to any role this seems like an artifact
> of Liberty ?
> >These should just be attribute assertions that any role can use.
>
> Metadata is the data that drives SAML profile and binding interoperability
> and efficiency. If a particular "role" is not identified in those
> documents,
> then it doesn't need metadata as such. IMHO anyway.
>
> But as new roles are identified as needing metadata, a provider's metadata
> can be extended to include its metadata for those roles.
>
> -- Scott
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the
> roster of the OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security-services/mem
> bers/leave_workgroup.php.
