RE: [security-services] new bindings and profile drafts uploaded

> Regarding the idea of where to put the "common" information that was in 
> the original Bindings/Profiles spec: I wonder if maybe we should put the 
> "Specification of additional bindings and profiles" in the conformance 
> doc.  (Prateek, what do you think?)  Considering that the conformance 
> doc explains how to document what you're conforming to, this seems 
> appropriate to me.

+1

> Regarding "confirmation method identifiers", I can see this 
> going into Section 7 in the core.

+2

> Regarding the "artifact format", I'm not sure...  Maybe Bindings is the 
> right place for it.

+3

Basically exactly what I had in mind.

-- Scott