Re: [security-services] Groups - sstc-saml-bindings-2.0-draft-06-diff.sxwuploaded

John,

Thanks for taking the time to give feedback - very helful! I just wanted 
to answer your question:

ext John Hughes wrote:
> Comments are below (lines number based on the diff version of the doc)
> 
> John

> - lines 450->463 and 464->484.  Are these processing rules something we have
> invented or are the in use else where?

464-484 are an adaptation of the Liberty ID-FF rules for signing 
URL-encoded protocol messages. 450-463 are rules that I mostly invented, 
and should thus be scrutinized carefully :)

Cheers,

- JohnK