> There was considerable debate, a clear motion, and a positive
> vote during one of the early SAML face-to-face meetings (F2F2
> or F2F3, I think, well before SAML 1.0 was published) that
> SAML assertions would *ONLY* be about Principals, and nothing else.
>
> Not to say we can't change that, but SAML 1.1 is *explicitly*
> not supposed to support such use cases.
Unfortunately, SAML 1.1 also distinguishes extension points for
SubjectStatement and just Statement, which tends to undermine that
prohibition. At the very least, nothing in the spec makes it clear.
-- Scott
