RE: [security-services] RE: AuthenticationMethod / NameIdentifier andKerberos authentication

> When the IESG complete their review of Kerberos 
> clarifications the Kerberos 5 protocol will be assigned a new 
> RFC number, so using 1510 is not good moving forward ? Maybe 
> we can support both :1510 and :Kerberos in SAML 2.0 for 
> backwards compatability ?

Right, well, like I said, if the method URIs change anyway because we move
them into context classes, then it's moot. If not, the committee can decide
whether we need to deprecate it or whatever.

-- Scott