> Qualifier -> Qual
>
> I give this one a C grade. It doesn't look that good, and
> people don't really elide the "ifier" when they talk. I suppose
> "Qualif" is an option, but it doesn't save that much.
>
> In saml:BaseIDAbstractType:
> s/NameQualifier/NameQual/
> s/SPNameQualifier/SPNameQual/
Different suggestion...how about we drop the Name part and just make it
Qualifier and SPQualifier.
> Reference -> Ref
+1, I almost just did it in my edits. If nobody objects, I'll just go ahead
and do it in the next draft I'm going to publish.
> Confirmation -> Conf
I wanted this one, myself.
> Condition -> (null)
+1
> Attribute -> Attrib or Att
Agree with Irving, I would use Attr if anything, but don't think it's a big
deal.
> Service -> Svc
It's used so little, I don't think it matters.
> Assertion -> Assn
Don't think this is needed.
-- Scott
