Re: [security-services] Additional suggestions for naming changes

From
Polar Humenn <>
Date
2004-05-19T18:16:59+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [security-services] Additional suggestions for naming changes
What are these abbreviations for? Is it to make this supposedly "readable"
XML less readable?  Your unix is showing. :)

Cheers,
-Polar


On Wed, 19 May 2004, Eve L. Maler wrote:

> Okay, here's my (biased?) assessment what I've heard so far.
>
> Reference -> Ref             yes
> Condition -> (null)          yes
> Confirmation -> Conf         maybe
> Attribute -> Attr            maybe
> NameQualifier -> Qualifier   maybe
> Assertion -> Assn            no?
> Service -> Svc               no
> Qualifier -> Qual            no
> Statement -> Stmt            no
> Reauthenticate -> Reauthn    no
>
> If people can weigh in so that we get a clearer idea of the leanings, it
> sounds like Scott can implement, in proposed form, the ones with the
> most support.
>
> To continue my weigh-in here, I don't think NameQualifier -> Qualifier
> is a good idea because the parent element is not Name, but rather BaseID.
>
> 	Eve
> --
> Eve Maler                                        +1 781 442 3190
> Sun Microsystems                            cell +1 781 354 9441
> Web Products, Technologies, and Standards    eve.maler @ sun.com
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security-services/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>