Oh, I see what you mean. In that sense, removing "Name" in these two
cases would simply complete the removal of "Name" that we already did on
the elements...?
Eve
Scott Cantor wrote:
>>To continue my weigh-in here, I don't think NameQualifier -> Qualifier
>>is a good idea because the parent element is not Name, but rather BaseID.
>
>
> That's one reason I prefer it, since the attributes do appear on the base
> type, so it's not clear that the only thing they might qualify is a "name".
> I guess one could argue whether they're needed on the base type, but they're
> useful for the Encrypted case as well, so...
>
> -- Scott
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security-services/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>
--
Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 354 9441
Web Products, Technologies, and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com
