We've actively discussed the details of the schedule since at least the
F2F in Austin back in March. It's unnecessary to hold interop testing
prior to publication of a Committee Draft, but if you thought it was
imperative, you should have brought it up well in advance (e.g., at the
March meeting you yourself hosted).
Eve
Anthony Nadalin wrote:
> I believe that we should complete an interop cycle before we go to CD,
> at this point I don't know if there are interoperability and/or
> implementation issues.
>
> Anthony Nadalin | work 512.838.0085 | cell 512.289.4122
> Inactive hide details for "Mishra, Prateek"
> <>"Mishra, Prateek" <>
>
>
> *"Mishra, Prateek" <>*
>
> 08/10/2004 10:52 AM
>
>
>
> To
>
>
>
> cc
>
>
> Subject
>
> [security-services] New Schedule for SAML 2.0 Standardization
>
>
>
>
> Based on an assessment of where we are today, the Chairs and our Chief
> Editor are proposing the following revised schedule:
>
> (1) All drafts complete by EOD, Wednesday, August 10, 2004
>
> (2) "CD package" published to list by EOD, Friday, August 12, 2004
>
> (3) CD vote on August 17, 2004
> (OASIS 30 day review period ends September 16, 2004)
>
> (4) Final disposition of all comments on September 21, 2004
>
> (4) Revise drafts for submission by September 28
> (Second meeting after review period ends)
>
> (5) OASIS submission completed by October 8
> (enters OASIS standardization process beginning October 15).
>
> - prateek
--
Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 354 9441
Web Products, Technologies, and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com
