RE: [security-services] Web SSO <AuthnRequest> conformance

From
Scott Cantor <>
Date
2004-10-26T18:03:20+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [security-services] Web SSO <AuthnRequest> conformance
My mistake, I see POST isn't required. Personally, I think it should be.
Ultimately, POST is the purest binding with no extra calls or assumptions.
Apart from signature support, which is pretty easy now, it's really the
simplest.

I don't think it's reasonable to assume requests will fit, and 2k isn't even
a good guess at a limit. Some devices in some deployments are crazy low
(256), so being able to configure it to use something else is important.

-- Scott