Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [security-services] Comments/questions on sstc-saml-metadata-2.0-cd-02

From
Scott Cantor <>
Date
2004-11-11T18:04:58+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [security-services] Comments/questions on sstc-saml-metadata-2.0-cd-02
>3.	There is no metadata to indicate that an entity supports the URI
> protocol binding. Should we add something for this? 

While I was reviewing the other changes, I noted this issue is in fact
addressed by the AssertionIDRequestService element. You can use the Binding
attribute to indicate that it's a URI binding endpoint, and not a SOAP
endpoint.

-- Scott
Next in thread → Next in month →