Re: Authentication Context Comments

I'll note first that I will be on vacation for the next 2 weeks. And 
when is the appropriate time to make the requested AuthnMethod change?

- JohnK

ext Paul Madsen wrote:

>Hi Prateek, I agree with your proposed change (as long as the 'AuthNMethod'
>was a typo and you meant AuthnMethod :-) )
> 
>Thanks
> 
>Paul
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mishra, Prateek [mailto:]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 11:46 AM
>To: 
>Cc: ; 
>Subject: Authentication Context Comments 
>
>
>I had taken an editorial action to review recent comments on the
>authentication context specification and check if all updates had been
>picked up in schema and documents. The only comment from the relevant time
>period I found was:
> 
>Errors in Authentication Context Schemas
> 
>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200409/msg00089.html
><http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200409/msg00089.html
>  
>
> 
>Resolutions to date:
> 
>1) No change, the idea is that RestrictedLengthType is a utility type used
>by RestrictedPassword.
>The minimum size restriction is intentional rather than accidental.
> 
>2) Proposed change has been made.
> 
>3) Use of <AuthenticationMethod> in the core AC schema versus <AuthNMethod>
>in all derived
>classes. The intention here is to use the same name (the derived classes all
>
>restrict AuthenticationMethod but refer to AuthNMethod instead). This change
>has not been made.
> 
> 
>Proposed change:   replace AuthenticationMethod by AuthNMethod in core AC
>schema
>(and specification).
>
>  
>