Since a implementation may not support all, then "successfully process" could mean ignore or send fault/error. I just don't know what this will achieve.
Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
"Scott Cantor" <>
"Scott Cantor" <>
01/05/2005 10:02 AM
To
Anthony Nadalin/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
cc
"'Philpott, Robert'" <>, <>
Subject
RE: [security-services] Proposed addition to Section 3.3 of Conformance
> So "process" may be ignoring or sending a fault/error.
How about "successfully process"? Not in any specific deployment, just in
general.
-- Scott
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:
