RE: Candidate 2.0 errata/erratum/corrigendum

Scott -
Thanks for the note......I create a new SAML 2.0 corrigendum and will note
these three in them. We should probably spend some time on Tuesday's con
call to discuss the disposition of these items.

Thanks,
Jahan


------------------------------
Jahan Moreh
Chief Security Architect
310.288.2141


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Cantor [mailto:]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 11:36 AM
> To: 
> Cc: 
> Subject: Candidate 2.0 errata/erratum/corrigendum
>
>
> Whatever, Latin's dead. Stuff what might be changed. Jahan, I'm
> copying you
> becauser you were the last volunteer to compile and maintain a list.
>
> A few small items floating about I'm aware of (thanks to Tom S for these
> nits).
>
> 1. Clarifying metadata requirements in the various profiles. For example,
> it's required by implication that if you support the Artifact binding for
> some profile that your role descriptor also needs an
> ArtifactResolutionService element, but this isn't stated anywhere.
>
> 2. Specifying the URL encoding supported by an HTTP Redirect binding
> endpoint. It fell off my list to specify something for this, so
> we might add
> an extension attribute to support this.
>
> 3. Clarifying that SAML 1.1 artifacts have no place or use in SAML 2.0.
>
> Nothing that I see should hold up submission Friday, just wanted to track
> them for later.
>
> -- Scott
>