Status re Gross response [Was: RE: [security-services] Agenda for 1-Mar SSTC con-call]

Re:

 

>We had planned to entertain a motion
to move the Thomas Gross response document to CD status (sstc-gross-sec-analysis-response->01.pdf).  But as
per the 1-Feb con-call, we were going to provide Thomas Gross a copy and
provide him an opportunity to respond.  >I do not recall an AI nor saw any mail to
him from someone to do this.  So do we still wish to move this to CD
status?

 

Early in February, Prateek sent a message
to Thomas; he responded shortly thereafter indicating interest in reviewing the
SSTC document.  I don’t believe that I’ve seen any further
discussion on it since then (from Thomas or within the TC), however. 

 

Paging through the -01 .pdf  now, I
see a couple of editorial fine points:

 

Line 84: “security services”
-> “security service”

 

Line 167, delete comma following “specifications”

 

--jl