Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [security-services] Metadata extension proposal/namespace

From
Scott Cantor <>
Date
2005-03-22T20:21:40+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [security-services] Metadata extension proposal/namespace
> if only because it establishes a convention to use when we do 
> our next extension.

Well, given that it's an XML namespace, the idea behind a generic name was
that we could add any additional extensions we adopted to it. Even the 1.1
SourceID thing if we wanted to change that.

Not saying we have to do that, but adding new top level elements to the
schema doesn't break anything.

-- Scott
Next in thread → Next in month →