← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
Proposed erratum resolution for PE8
Title: Message Hi, here is proposed text for PE8. PE8: SLO and NameID termination [SAMLBind] Replace the last sentence in 2479-2480 (section 3.6.3) with: "In general it SHOULD NOT invalidate any active session(s) of the principal for whom the relationship has been terminated. If the receiving provider is an identity provider, it SHOULD NOT invalidate any active session(s) of the principal established with other service providers. A requesting provider MAY send a <LogoutRequest> message prior to initiating a name identifier termination by sending a <ManageNameIDRequest> message if that is the requesting provider's intent (e.g., the name identifier termination is initiated via an administrator who wished to terminate all user activity). The requesting provider MUST NOT send a <LogoutRequest> message after the <ManageNameIDRequest> message is sent." My intent here is that the MNI protocol should not imply SLO in any way. I.e., if the requester wishes an SLO, it should do so explicity using a <LogoutRequest> message prior to MNI. Tom. Thomas Wisniewski Software Architect Phone: (201) 891-0524 Cell: (201) 248-3668 EntrustÒ Securing Digital Identities & Information
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →