RE: [security-services] Groups - Errata for the OASIS Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) V2.0; Working Draft 04 (sstc-saml-errata-2.0-draft-04.pdf) uploaded

I wasn't sure if that errata item had been detached from the larger Name
ID discussion.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Cantor [mailto:]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 8:57 AM
> To: Brian Campbell; ; -
> open.org
> Subject: RE: [security-services] Groups - Errata for the OASIS
Security
> Assertion Markup Language (SAML) V2.0; Working Draft 04
(sstc-saml-errata-
> 2.0-draft-04.pdf) uploaded
> 
> > In section 3.5 'PE5: Rules for NameIDPolicy' the two options for
> > additional wording refer to the 'persistent' format where they
should
> > refer to the 'transient' format.  I think Scott just had a typo in
the
> > wording he proposed which he subsequently corrected but it looks
like
> > the correction didn't make it into this doc.
> 
> Yes, however, that particular errata was also waiting (probably
endlessly)
> for any consensus to emerge around how to clarify AllowCreate, the
> thinking
> being that some of those options may involve format-specific
compromises
> anyway. I don't personally think that helps fix anything, but it might
> push
> us toward one or the other approach wrt to transient.
> 
> -- Scott