← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

XPath document/profile naming

From
Cameron Morris <>
Date
2005-05-12T21:21:29+00:00
ID
Thread
XPath document/profile naming
On the call you mentioned that the xpath attribute profile should use a different naming convention.  Specifically that it shouldn't be referencing version 2 of the saml specifications.  I'm unsure if you were talking about the file name or the profile name urn.  The minutes haven't been posted and I don't recall exactly.  I've been searching the documents and emails over and I haven't found anything.  So I guessed.  Do the following match our convention?
    

    
 

    
Current names
    

    
file:   "sstc-saml-2.0-xpath-attribute-profile-[version]"
    

    
profile: "urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:profiles:attribute:XPath"
    

    
 

    
Proposed names:
    

    
file:  "draft-saml-path-attribute-profile-[version]"   -- follows pattern of saml 1.x metadata
    

    
profile: "urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:profiles:attribute:XPath"
    

    
 

    
This profile name change seems odd because this is a profile on the SAML 2.0 specification - even if it isn't part of the saml 2.0 specs.
    

    
 

    
Also, I thought you had other objections but I don't recall what they were?  
    

    
- Cameron
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread