Title: Message
Jahan,
no, this is a new Errata item.
Tom.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jahan Moreh
[mailto:]
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:43
AM
To: Thomas Wisniewski; SAML
Subject: RE:
[security-services] Errata for NameIDPolicy
Thanks Tom. I assume this is for PE5 as published in draft 07 of the
errata document. I will monitor this list for any discussion and on Tuesday we
can hopefully finalize this during our con
call.
Jahan
------------------------------
Jahan Moreh
Chief
Security Architect
310.288.2141
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Wisniewski
[mailto:]
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005
5:06 AM
To: SAML
Subject: [security-services] Errata for
NameIDPolicy
Johan, I'm
proposing the following errata text in Core as a two new paragraphs between
line 2139 and 2140 related to NameIDPolicy. It centers on insuring
that an IDP only returns a NameID that matches a NameIDPolicy (in
terms of Format and SPNameQualifier):
"When a Format defined in Section 8.3.7
is used other than urn:oasis:names:TC:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:unspecified or
urn:oasis:names:TC:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:encrypted, then if the identity
provider returns any assertions, the Format value of the <NameID>
within any <Assertion> MUST be identical to the Format value
supplied in the <NameIDPolicy>.
If the
Format value is set
to urn:oasis:names:TC:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:persistent and if the
SPNameQualifier is not omitted, then if the identity provider returns
any assertions, the SPNameQualifier value of
the <NameID> within any <Assertion> MUST be
identical to the SPNameQualifier value supplied in the
<NameIDPolicy>."
Tom.
Thomas Wisniewski
Software Architect
Phone: (201) 891-0524
Cell: (201)
248-3668
EntrustÒ
Securing Digital Identities
& Information
